Randomized clinical trials in pregnancy, fertility, and newborn care (gestational diabetes, postpartum haemorrhage, IVF, breastfeeding, neonatal care), from NEJM · Lancet · Nature Medicine · BMJ (2024–2026)
12findings in 7 areas, across 5 of 8 papers
How the star rating worksShowHide
Every paper starts at 5★ and loses stars for the concrete problems the review finds — never a vague average, just a running total:
Reporting — 8 dimensionseach dimension that fails (−½★) or is partially met (−¼★)−½ / −¼
Statistics · Integrity · Claimseach serious problem (−1★) · each medium problem−½★
Citationseach retracted or unverifiable reference−½★
Copyeditonly when the manuscript needs a full edit−½★
The rating never drops below 1★, and a demonstrable critical failure (an impossible statistic, a proven ethics violation) caps it at 1★ on its own.
Papers are reviewed on their original full text — any retraction notice is removed before analysis — so the findings reflect the science, not the label.
How to read this. The engine surfaces specific, verifiable rigor problems. It does notpredict retractions, and a “pass” is not a guarantee of soundness. Papers are analyzed on their published full text with any retraction notice removed, so detection is content-based. Real-world outcome labels (retracted, landmark) are curator-assigned from the public record; the verdict and every surfaced problem are the engine’s own. These are selected examples.